Peak Oil and Global Warming Essay

There is now a great deal debate regarding whether the rest embrocate supply can last to do the worst of the negative personal effects of global warming. According to one disputable analysis done by scientists at the University of Uppsala based in Sweden, every last(predicate) fuel volition be burnt even before temperature levels dumbfound exceedingly hot (Coghlan, 2003). Although estimates on the remaining crude oil militia atomic number 18 not the same, it is believed that oil will reach its peak by as early as 2010.The scientists say that combined oil and bungle reserves amount to only 3,500 pose which is less than the very optimistic figures from the Intergovernmental display board on Climate Change (IPCC) (Coghlan, 2003). On the opposite hand, IPCC scientists defended that even if the oil reserves is not enough to constitute the more devastating effects of global warming, the burning of coal will more than make up for the deficiency.Nonetheless, both sides agree that burning coal is even more ill (Coghlan, 2003). In a worst-case scenario, it is depicted that in that location is still 18,000 billion barrels of oil left but according to University of Uppsala geologist Kjell Aleklett that claim is completely phantasmagoric and that even the expected 8,000 billion barrels is more than double the remaining amount estimated by Sweden.The IPCC, however still argues that their predictions still has grounds victimization a much broader and internationally accepted range of oil and gas estimates and even if reserves of oil and gas do run out, there is still huge reserves of coal that may be burned for fuel or be converted into gasoline notwithstanding the point that coal is much more harmful to the environment because it produces more emissions and particulates (Coghlan, 2003). roseola oil and global warming are two related problems and work out these two problems requires the same measures which is by minify reliance on fossil hydrocarbon fue ls. For America, coal, oil, and natural should be eliminated as a primary source of aptitude (Holson, 2007). Aside from being an heftiness source, oil is as well as being utilise as feedstock, particularly for the manufacturing of plastics, pharmaceuticals, synthetic rubber, asphalt, lubricants, nitrogenous fertilizers, pesticides, and insecticides.It is too an important election for the military especially during periods of war (Holson, 2007). There are umteen otherwise ersatz sources of strength that produce basically no emissions and are renewable. much(prenominal) energy sources include solar energy, wind energy, hydroelectric energy, and geothermal energy. These forms of energy sources meet already proved efficient and effective yet many refuse to market it because of greater profit earned from oil and other exhaustible fossil fuels.Nuclear energy is another efficient energy source but this should be given much thought because atomic power provides all sorts of oth er risks. The Kyoto Protocol is also a in force(p) recourse as it will aggregately reduce greenhouse gas emissions of countries that have committed to the protocol. Being one of the top producers of greenhouse gases, the US should also ratify the protocol, as currently, it is the only country that refuses to ratify the protocol subsequently Australia agreed last year.US President George W. Bush that said reducing emissions would be bad for the US economy. However, failure of the US to do so will be bad for the rest of the world. Be it peak oil or global warming. The best recourse would be finding alternative energy sources. This would reduce oil consumption rate and oil will be available for a longer time avoiding the possibility of an utmost(prenominal) energy crisis. Alternative energy sources that literally produce no emissions would also be more beneficial to the environment.