Drug Test Benefits

Recent increases in the engagement of illegal medicates and problems related to that routine harbor raised a classification of humanity wellness and rubber eraser concerns. These concerns own light-emitting diode many to propose drug interrogatory as one of the best ways to combat the pro lookration of drug character. Although the focus is examen for drugs, it is worth noting that similar calls for increase interrogation has risen repayable to the spread of human immunodeficiency virus and the panic it poses to those exposed to it. Cl previous(predicate), these common health and pencil eraser concerns conflict with privacy claims of those beingness targeted for examen.Nevertheless, many view the world safety threat as serious whopping to override completely any separate privacy sakes. Indeed, public opinion hug drugvass indicate that at that place is widespread clog for a variety of interrogation architectural plans, purge those that are random and ma ndatory. Although drug treat should not be tolerated in the oeuvre, allot must be taken to aimt the extent to which drug interrogation intrudes on peck=s privacy. The idea is to routine the technology carefully, with adequate justification, and with enough safeguards and precautions to tick that examination is done thoughtfully and responsibly. twain the government and private business repugn that they have a signifi tailt interest in see citizens and employees for a variety of reasons. First, they domiciliate fight the Adrug email&160protected by weeding out users and stopping drug use. Second, they can ensure safety by telling conditions that pose a serious threat to co- workers or the public. Third, they essay employees so they can maintain a fully reactive and stiff workforce. Fourth, they can identify those who go away be unable to work in the future. Fifth, it leave alone help reduce the salute of employee health care plans.Finally, drug examen leave hel p maintain public confidence in the integrity and trustworthiness of their operations. virtually(prenominal) insurance agencies argue that runing is necessary because it fundamentally causes the healthier employees to support lavishlyer premiums to cover the costs of the coverage for those who are at greater pretend levels. All of these arguments supply strong reasons to think drug testing. In some industries, such as health care and transportation, level off casual drug or inebriantic drink use can result in not only increased costs, that excessively in lawsuits and loss of life. dismantle if the employee is not chemically dependent, a fellow or family member using drugs or alcohol can mean helpless work, extensive individualal reverberate calls and increased dependent medical benefits. Supreme judicial system justice Antonin Scalia order drug testing to be an invasion of privacy and a practice of A sine qua nonless indignity. He states that if a blood test i s used, it involves puncturing the skin. If a uranalysis is utilized, the sample must some eras be gained under direct rumination to guard against drug-free substitutions and falsification of results.He feels that at that place are more effective methods of identifying drug users. For example, a daily utterance of moods, behavior, and productivity, can take note drug use and be dealt with immediately. Many employees feel that implementing a drug testing program go forth prove to the lack of trust amid the employer and employee. They feel that this will cause high turnover rates from year to year. It will besides lower employee morale and military strength while on the mull. These problems could be avoided by just utilizing the observance plan rear earlier.Opponents of drug testing also focuses on the limitations of the testing procedures, arguing that the tests are highly in hi-fi. One worry is the sensitivity of the tests. Many types of tests procedure inaccurate, innocen t parties will be harmed because close tests produce a large digit of false positive results, indicating that thither has been drug use when there has actually been none. Such false positive results can rise from the use of medications, passive ingestion of marijuana smoke, or the technology use for many drug tests. medicate testing opposers cite the human error of re try lab personnel that further implicates the accuracy of results The basic two cases on drug testing to reach the Supreme Court were argued in 1988. From the decisions issued the following year, it is clear that the court held that weewee tests are a significant onset into a fundamentally private domain. Since then, every court that has addressed the issue has found that urinalysis and blood tests intrude on privacy as a search and seizure forbidden under the fourthly amendment.Courts have mainly focused on the privacy invasion involved, first, in the bring of urination and the manner in which the standard is obtained, and second, in the individuals interest and safeguarding the confidentiality of the information contained in the sample. While drug tests might also violate the fifth amendment protection of due process and constitutional privacy interests, courts have taken the privacy claims of the fourth amendment to be the most forceful constitutional threat. round surveys show employees strongly support drug testing because it promises greater safety and unanimity at work. However, scores of civil suits in the early and mid 1980s challenged the procedure as an invasion of privacy. The courts have upheld most testing programs, and fewer suits are now being fi conduct. In a study conducted by the society for Human Resources worry, human mental imagery professionals most consistently favored the use of drug and alcohol testing, soliciting criminal indicate checks, and monitoring visual display, terminal give awaystrokes and phone activity.While employers whitethorn deem these ac tivities as intrinsic to preserve workplace safety and productivity, many employees would argue that they violate their privacy, twain on the job and at home. Employees may not be invaded by having to inscribe in drug tests with the urinalysis. Technology has right so that any deterrent in a workers transaction while on the job due to drugs or alcohol will be monitored on computers. It is called performance or impairment testing by its creators, and is a game-like device that can test judgement and motor coordination through the top executive to manipulate a cursor on a VDT screen.The benefits reveal the cause of an employee impairment. process tests would offer more privacy to the worker and promote a less hostile environment People have objected more often than not to random drug testing, which is mainly contain to government and private jobs that effect public safety, like those at nuclear great power plants, airlines, railroads and trucking companies. More than 90 p ct of the testing is of job applicants. But most of these same companies also test afterward accidents and when suspicions are aroused through extraordinary behavior.Fewer than 10 percent of the companies test randomly or at the sentence of annual physicals An employer has an utmost(a) standard of becharm on an individual to win some type of interposition for their habituation. They are in the position to provide incentive for evaluate interference, as well as horny support afterwards, because the job usually is of extreme importance to the addicted individual. The forethought should offer and gateible health insurance plan so that when the employee needs to receive the treatment that they can easily do so without having to involve several other peopleOnce the addict has received the required care, their job structure should be alter by management. They should be placed in a less stressful atmosphere. Their count of work decreases for a certain amount of time, and t hey should not be placed on a demanding quota schedule that could trigger an wound up swing back toward the addiction The key to this success is having a good saloon program in place to detect problems at an early stage in their development. If these problems can be detected early then outpatient treatment can be successful, says Maureen Whitmore of Occupational Health Services in Larkspur, California.Once a telephoner has invested their time and money in rehabilitation of the employee, there are steps that must be followed to keep the employee from returning to their addiction. First, a lucifer support group should be provided where go around discussion is encouraged in toilsome to cope with a new life and the new found pressure of work. Second, management should help their employees reintegrate back into the workplace. They will be confused and easily persuaded by stress that might have led to the problem in the beginning.Third, the company should confound AA meetings on-si te and provide a crisis number to call in case of an emergency. Fourth, supervisors should be educated to watch for returning signs that the person is under stress. Fifth, management should involve family members and provide lifestyle education. Finally, stress reduced activities should be offered on-site, such as aerobics and seaworthiness classes, and workshops on how to improve interpersonal skills. I feel that employee drug testing in some manner is essential to the performance and military capability of an employee in a company.Management needs the assurance that every employee is doing their job without any type of impairment from an extracurricular source. However, I also feel that urinalysis testing is an invasion of privacy. As an employer, I will not be have-to doe with with what types of drugs the employee is taking, but he is impairing the performance of the company. As I mentioned earlier, technology has advanced in such a manner that there will be no need for urinal ysis tests. Performance or impairment testing programs will test the employee=s judgement and motor coordination through the ability to manipulate a cursor on a VDT screen.This will provide the employer with accurate information on the abilities of the employee to perform their job. It also keeps the employees addiction private and not for their employers to know. I feel that the increased health insurance coverage and the increased ease of access for employees will help them seek treatment for their addiction. However, there will need to be severe disciplinary actions for those who continually test positive. Once an employee has received treatment, the follow-up plans must be persuaded by management.This should help the employee to receive the needed attention for their problem, and help the company continue to have an effective employee. Drug testing has many benefits and set backs for both employers and employees. Certain types of drug testing are necessary in to days workplace f or there to be an increased effectiveness of a company on their industry. However, employees lock have privacy rights that cannot be infringed upon. A good and successful detection program and rehabilitation program are essential to the survival of the employee in the workplace. Eventually, the drug addiction will impair their abilities for life.